Security · Privacy · Compliance

Turn complex assurance work into clear, actionable decisions.

AuditFlow helps organizations assess, document and improve their cybersecurity, privacy and compliance posture through structured assessments, prioritized findings and professional reporting.

auditflowapp.nl
AuditFlowWebsite Security Assurance
Illustrative product view
ASSESSMENT TARGETexample.com
A
Overall score93%
Residual risk7%
Priority findings05
Security postureStrong
Security91%
Privacy96%
Email100%
EvidenceNeeds attention
P2
Security headersEvidence review
P3
Control evidenceFollow-up action
90-day roadmapASSESSPRIORITIZEIMPROVE

Built for structured assurance across

CybersecurityPrivacyComplianceRiskExecutive reporting

EU & DUTCH REGULATORY EXPOSURE

Understand the legal consequences behind cybersecurity risk.

A technical weakness is not automatically a legal infringement. But where security failures contribute to non-compliance with applicable data-protection or cybersecurity duties, organisations can face notification obligations, supervisory action, corrective measures and significant administrative fines.

FROM TECHNICAL WEAKNESS TO REGULATORY EXPOSURE
01Security weakness
02Control failure or exploitation
03Data or service impact
04Regulatory obligations
05Financial and reputational exposure
GDPR / AVG - ARTICLE 32

Security of processing

Security measures must be appropriate to the risk.

Article 32 requires controllers and processors to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures. Depending on the circumstances, those measures include resilience, the ability to restore availability and access after an incident, and a process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of security measures.

01
PROTECT

Support confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience of processing systems and services.

02
RECOVER

Be able to restore availability and access to personal data in a timely manner after a physical or technical incident.

03
ASSESS RISK

Select measures appropriate to the risks associated with processing.

04
TEST & EVALUATE

Maintain a process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of security measures.

GDPR / AVG - ARTICLE 83

Administrative fine exposure

GDPR Article 83 establishes different maximum fine tiers. The applicable tier depends on the legal obligation infringed and the circumstances of the case.

ARTICLE 83(4)Obligations including Articles 25-39
UP TO€10 MILLION
OR
2%of total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year
WHICHEVER IS HIGHER

This tier includes infringement of Article 32 security-of-processing obligations.

ARTICLE 83(5)More serious infringement categories
UP TO€20 MILLION
OR
4%of total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year
WHICHEVER IS HIGHER

This higher tier covers categories including basic processing principles, data-subject rights and certain international-transfer obligations.

These are statutory maximums, not automatic penalties. Article 83 requires the circumstances of each individual case to be considered when deciding whether to impose a fine and its amount.

GDPR - ARTICLE 33

The 72-hour personal data breach clock

Where notification is required, the controller must notify the competent supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, no later than 72 hours after becoming aware of the personal data breach.

Notification to the supervisory authority is not required under Article 33(1) where the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. If notification is made after 72 hours, reasons for the delay must accompany it.
GDPR72 HOURSARTICLE 33
1Become aware
2Assess the breach
3Document the incident
4Notify the authority where required

NIS2 - ARTICLES 21, 23 & 34

Cybersecurity risk management and enforcement exposure

For entities within scope, NIS2 requires appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational cybersecurity risk-management measures and establishes incident-reporting obligations. Article 34 sets administrative-fine frameworks for infringements of Articles 21 or 23.

EUNIS2CYBERSECURITY
ESSENTIAL ENTITIES
UP TO€10 MILLION
OR
2%of total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year
WHICHEVER IS HIGHER

NIS2 Article 34 requires Member States to provide for a maximum fine of at least this level for essential entities infringing Article 21 or 23.

IMPORTANT ENTITIES
UP TO€7 MILLION
OR
1.4%of total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year
WHICHEVER IS HIGHER

NIS2 Article 34 requires Member States to provide for a maximum fine of at least this level for important entities infringing Article 21 or 23.

Scope matters

NIS2 does not apply to every organisation. Entity classification, sector, size and applicable national implementation rules must be considered.

NL
THE NETHERLANDS

Dutch Cyberbeveiligingswet

IN FORCE15 AUGUST 2026

The Dutch Cyberbeveiligingswet implements NIS2 requirements in the Netherlands for organisations within its scope. It introduces cybersecurity duties including risk management and incident reporting, alongside supervision and enforcement.

01Registration where applicable
02Cybersecurity risk-management duty
03Incident-reporting obligations
04Management responsibility and oversight
05Supervision and enforcement
Organisations are responsible for determining whether they fall within the scope of the Cyberbeveiligingswet.
i
Important legal context

AuditFlow supports security and compliance assessment by helping organisations identify potential control gaps, evaluate risk indicators, organise evidence and prioritise remediation. AuditFlow does not provide legal advice, regulatory certification or a guarantee of compliance. Legal applicability and enforcement consequences depend on the organisation, sector, processing activities, facts and circumstances.

One assurance workflow

Move from fragmented checks to a structured view of risk and action.

AuditFlow organizes assessment work into a consistent flow that helps teams understand what was checked, what matters most and what should happen next.

01

Structured assessments

Run repeatable assurance assessments with clearly organized controls, evidence and outcomes.

02

Prioritized findings

Turn assessment results into focused findings so teams can concentrate on the issues that require attention.

03

Risk visibility

Present security, privacy and compliance posture in a format that supports practical risk conversations.

04

Professional reports

Translate technical assessment output into structured reports designed for review, communication and follow-up.

05

Executive insight

Surface scores, priorities and management-level context without forcing decision-makers through raw technical data.

06

Remediation planning

Connect findings with actionable priorities and roadmap-oriented follow-up.

How AuditFlow works

A clear path from assessment to improvement.

Keep assurance work understandable from the first check through management reporting and remediation planning.

01

Assess

Run a structured assessment against the relevant assurance scope.

02

Analyze

Organize results into scores, findings, risk signals and supporting context.

03

Prioritize

Identify the issues and actions that deserve attention first.

04

Report & improve

Communicate results through professional reporting and a practical remediation path.

Reporting that supports decisions

Make assessment results useful beyond the technical team.

AuditFlow is designed to convert assurance data into reporting that can support security teams, compliance stakeholders and management discussions.

  • Executive-level score and posture visibility
  • Prioritized findings and risk context
  • Structured remediation priorities
  • Professional PDF reporting

Executive assurance snapshot

Clear posture. Clear priorities.

Illustrative example

82%Assessment posture
Structured
07Findings
P1–P3Priorities
90Roadmap

Security, privacy and compliance

A connected view of assurance.

Security and compliance decisions rarely live in isolation. AuditFlow brings related assurance signals into a more coherent operating view.

Cybersecurity

Identify security posture signals and communicate technical findings in a structured way.

Privacy

Support privacy-focused assessment and documentation with clear evidence and findings.

Compliance

Organize control-oriented assessment work and make gaps easier to review and prioritize.

Built for action

Give technical teams and decision-makers a shared view.

AuditFlow helps reduce the gap between assessment detail and management action by organizing results around evidence, risk, priorities and reporting.

Consistent assessment structure

Clearer communication of risk

Management-ready reporting

Action-oriented remediation context

Turn your next assessment into a clearer action plan.

Start with AuditFlow and bring assessment, findings, reporting and remediation priorities into one structured workflow.